Any prediction about new RJ ?

Vik., 4/5/2023, 1:07PM(388 days ago) @Riley- one person liked this

How about he is not Ridge's son? RJ is one of the paternities what could be easily revisited. They all thought Nick was the father for a long time. I like the gay theory, but I doubt they would do it for real

Why would Bell be interested in revisiting RJ's paternity? If he wanted Brooke to have a 20ish son on the show who's not Ridge's but Nick's, he could simply bring back Jack instead. He wouldn't need to take away Ridge's only kid with Brooke after already taking Bridget away from him in the 90s.

And changing RJ's paternity wouldn't be as easy as you make it sound. The only reason the characters ever thought that Brooke's unborn baby was Nick's was because Sally Spectra had tampered with the result of the first paternity test to get back at Brooke. At that point the audience didn't know yet if her manipulation had worked or if Nick was really RJ's father, just like no one knew in the early 90s if Sheila's manipulation had really changed the result of Bridget's paternity test or not.
But only a few months later (not years later like in Bridget's case) two more paternity tests were done, one secretly by Deacon and Jackie while Brooke was still pregnant and the other one right after RJ was born. Both tests proved that Ridge was RJ's father. Who would ever believe that the result of one manipulated test early in the pregnancy was more accurate than the results of two subsequent tests that haven't been manipulated at all? And RJ has always been played by dark-haired actors ever since he was 4, which also indicates that Bell has never even toyed with the idea of changing his paternity later on.

Hi Riley. I know you're one of the few Bridge fan left around here; and that you've wanted a RJ return before. Did they pick the right actor and what are your wishes for the character?

---

chat Reply

Like

reply Share

Share Tweet email Email

bookmark Save

---